4.7 Article

Clinical Early-Onset Sepsis Is Equally Valid to Culture-Proven Sepsis in Predicting Outcome in Infants after Preterm Rupture of Membranes

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194539

Keywords

early-onset sepsis; mortality; preterm premature rupture of membranes; prematurity; severe morbidity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In preterm infants, clinical sepsis is more common than culture-proven sepsis and is equally valuable in predicting mortality and mortality or severe morbidity.
Background: Culture-proven sepsis is the gold standard in early-onset neonatal sepsis diagnosis. Infants born <= 29 weeks gestation after preterm rupture of membranes in the years 2009-2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study performed at a level III fetal-maternal unit. The study aimed to compare culture-proven sepsis, clinical sepsis and positive laboratory biomarkers <= 72 h as predictors of mortality before discharge and the combined outcome of mortality or severe short-term morbidity (severe cerebral morbidity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and retinopathy). Results: Of the 354 patients included, culture-proven sepsis, clinical sepsis and laboratory biomarkers were positive in 2.3%, 8.5% and 9.6%, respectively. The mortality rate was 37.5% for patients with culture-proven sepsis (3/8), 33.3% for patients with clinical sepsis (10/30) and 8.8% for patients with positive laboratory biomarkers (3/34), respectively. Mortality or severe morbidity occurred in 75.0% of patients with culture-proven sepsis (6/8), 80.0% of patients with clinical sepsis (24/30) and 44.1% of patients with positive laboratory biomarkers (15/34), respectively. Conclusion: In preterm infants after preterm rupture of membranes, clinical sepsis was almost four times more common and at least equally valuable in predicting mortality and mortality or severe morbidity compared to culture-proven sepsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available