4.7 Article

Influence of Multiple Donor Renal Arteries on the Outcome and Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194395

Keywords

kidney transplant; multiple arteries; anastomosis; reconstruction; outcome; delayed graft function; warm ischemia time; cold ischemia time; survival

Funding

  1. Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Leipzig

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that multiple-donor renal arteries should not be considered a contraindication to deceased kidney transplantation, as morbidity rates and long-term outcomes appear to be comparable to grafts with single arteries and less complex anastomoses.
Aim: Complex arterial reconstruction in kidney transplantation (KT) using kidneys from deceased donors (DD) warrants additional study since little is known about the effects on the mid- and long-term outcome and graft survival. Methods: A total of 451 patients receiving deceased donor KT in our department between 1993 and 2017 were included in our study. Patients were divided into three groups according to the number of arteries and anastomosis: (A) 1 renal artery, 1 arterial anastomosis (N = 369); (B) > 1 renal artery, 1 arterial anastomosis (N = 47); and (C) > 1 renal artery, > 1 arterial anastomosis (N = 35). Furthermore, the influence of localization of the arterial anastomosis (common iliac artery (CIA), versus non-CIA) was analyzed. Clinicopathological characteristics, outcome, and graft and patient survival of all groups were compared retrospectively. Results: With growing vascular complexity, the time of warm ischemia increased significantly (groups A, B, and C: 40 +/- 19 min, 45 +/- 19 min, and 50 +/- 17 min, respectively; p = 0.006). Furthermore, the duration of operation was prolonged, although this did not reach significance (groups A, B, and C: 175 +/- 98 min, 180 +/- 35 min, and 210 +/- 43 min, respectively; p = 0.352). There were no significant differences regarding surgical complications, post-transplant kidney function (delayed graft function, initial non-function, episodes of acute rejection), or long-term graft survival. Regarding the localization of the arterial anastomosis, non-CIA was an independent prognostic factor for deep vein thrombosis in multivariate analysis (CIA versus non-CIA: OR 11.551; 95% CI, 1.218-109.554; p = 0.033). Conclusion: Multiple-donor renal arteries should not be considered a contraindication to deceased KT, as morbidity rates and long-term outcomes seem to be comparable with grafts with single arteries and less complex anastomoses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available