4.7 Article

Evaluation of Anorectal Function in Perianal Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245909

Keywords

perianal Crohn's disease; anorectal function; high-resolution anorectal manometry; balloon expulsion test; 3D-endoanal ultrasound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that more than half of patients with treated/healed perianal Crohn's disease had sphincter abnormalities, many of whom were asymptomatic. Alterations in rectal sensation were frequently observed, with rectal hyposensitivity being more common.
Background: Perianal Crohn's disease is a disabling condition, with little known about anorectal function in healed/inactive perianal Crohn's disease; Aim: To evaluate anorectal function in a cohort of patients with treated/healed perianal Crohn's disease; Methods: Prospective cohort study, including high-resolution anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, and 3D-endoanal ultrasound in all patients; Results: Of the 16 patients studied (mean age +/- SD, 42 +/- 13 years), 12 (75%) were men. A laceration of the internal anal sphincter and/or anal scarring was seen in nine (56%) patients; there was no laceration of the external anal sphincter. Five (56%) of these nine patients had never experienced faecal incontinence. All had normal anal resting and squeeze pressures. Manometry suggested dyssynergia in 11 (69%) patients, with only one (6%) fulfilling the criteria for obstructed defecation. Hyposensitivity for at least one sensory parameter was seen in 11 (69%) patients and hypersensitivity in five (31%) patients; Conclusions: This study detected sphincter abnormalities in more than half of patients, many of whom were asymptomatic. Alterations in rectal sensation were frequently seen, more commonly with rectal hyposensitivity. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03819257).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available