4.7 Article

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus versus Continuous Epidural Infusion in Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225382

Keywords

programmed intermittent epidural bolus; continuous epidural infusion; upper abdominal surgery; epidural anesthesia; postoperative analgesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing data from patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery, we compared the effects of programmed intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion on postoperative opioid consumption, pain intensity, and local anesthetic consumption. Our results showed no significant differences between the two groups, indicating comparable postoperative analgesia quality and safety following major upper abdominal surgery. However, further evaluation of programmed intermittent epidural bolus is needed.
Although recent evidence shows that the programmed intermittent epidural bolus can provide improved analgesia compared to continuous epidural infusion during labor, its usefulness in major upper abdominal surgery remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion on the consumption of postoperative rescue opioids, pain intensity, and consumption of local anesthetic by retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent major upper abdominal surgery under ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural analgesia between July 2018 and October 2020. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption up to 72 h after surgery. The data of postoperative pain scores, epidural local anesthetic consumption, and adverse events from 193 patients were analyzed (continuous epidural infusion: n = 124, programmed intermittent epidural bolus: n = 69). There was no significant difference in the rescue opioid consumption in the 72 h postoperative period between the groups (33.3 mg [20.0-43.3] vs. 28.3 mg [18.3-43.3], p = 0.375). There were also no significant differences in the pain scores, epidural local anesthetic consumption, and incidence of adverse events. Our findings suggest that the quality of postoperative analgesia and safety following major upper abdominal surgery were comparable between the groups. However, the use of programmed intermittent epidural bolus requires further evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available