4.7 Article

A Compound Hop Index for Assessing Soccer Players' Performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010255

Keywords

athletic training; injury prevention; performance measure; soccer; sports medicine

Funding

  1. Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland [SUB.E060.21.001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to propose an effective method for simplifying single-leg hop test data to a single score. By collecting data from a male soccer team and calculating limb symmetry indexes and standardizing them, the "Compound Hop Index" (CHI) was derived, which significantly reduces, clarifies, and organizes hop performance measures data.
Athletes regularly have to pass a series of tests, among which one of the most frequently used functional performance measures are single-leg hop tests. As the collected individual results of tests constitute a large amount of data, strategies to decrease the amount of data without reducing the number of performed tests are being searched for. Therefore, the study aimed to present an effective method to reduce the hop-test battery data to a single score, namely, the Compound Hop Index (CHI) in the example of a soccer team. A male, first-league soccer team performed a battery of commonly used single-leg hop tests, including single hop and triple hop for distance tests and the six-meter timed hop test. Gathered data, including Limb Symmetry Indexes of the three tests, normalized to body height for the single- and triple-hop-tests distance separately for right and left legs, and the time of the six-meter timed hop test separately for right and left legs were standardized to z-scores. Consecutively, the z-scores were averaged and formed CHI. The developed CHI represents a novel score derived from the average of z-scores that significantly reduces, clarifies, and organizes the hop performance-measures data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available