4.7 Article

Correlation between Ultra-Wide-Field Retinal Imaging Findings and Vascular Supra-Aortic Changes in Takayasu Arteritis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214916

Keywords

Takayasu; arteritis; microaneurysm; ultra-wide-field imaging; hypoperfusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a significant correlation between retinal lesions and vascular stenosis in patients with Takayasu arteritis, suggesting that the number of microaneurysms could be used as a prognostic factor for TA.
(1) Background: Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a chronic inflammatory large-vessel vasculitis. Ultra-wide-field imaging allows describing the retinal lesions in these patients and correlating them with vascular supra-aortic stenosis. (2) Methods: In total, 54 eyes of 27 patients diagnosed with TA were included, and a complete ophthalmological examination was performed, including UWF color fundus photography (UWF-CFP), fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA), and computed tomography angiography measuring supra-aortic stenosis. Eleven patients underwent Doppler ultrasound imaging assessing the blood flow velocity (BFV) in the central retinal artery (CRA). (3) Results: Microaneurysms were detected in 18.5% of eyes on fundus examination, in 24.4% of eyes on UWF-CFP, and in 94.4% of eyes on UWF-FA. The number of microaneurysms significantly correlated with the presence of an ipsilateral supra-aortic stenosis (p = 0.026), the presence of hypertension (p = 0.0011), and the duration of the disease (p = 0.007). The number of microaneurysms per eye negatively correlated with the BFV in the CRA (r = -0.61; p = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: UWF-FA improved the assessment of TA-associated retinal findings. The significant correlation between the number of microaneurysms and the BFV in the CRA gives new insight to our understanding of Takayasu retinopathy. The total number of microaneurysms could be used as an interesting prognostic factor for TA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available