4.7 Article

Evaluation of Risk Prediction Models to Identify Cancer Therapeutics Related Cardiac Dysfunction in Women with HER2+Breast Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030847

Keywords

cardiotoxicity; risk prediction models; cardiac dysfunction; trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity

Funding

  1. Hold'em for Life Oncology Clinician Scientist Award at the University of Toronto's Faculty of Medicine
  2. Canada Research Chair in Cardiooncology [147814]
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective cohort study assessed the performance of three published risk prediction models in identifying the risk of Cancer-therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) during or immediately post treatment with trastuzumab therapy for HER2+ breast cancer. The results showed that these models can identify relative differences in CTRCD risk, but their ability to predict absolute risk is limited.
Cancer-therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is an important concern in women receiving trastuzumab therapy for HER2+ breast cancer. However, the ability to assess CTRCD risk remains limited. In this retrospective cohort study, we apply three published risk prediction models (Ezaz et al., NSABP-31 cardiac risk scores (CRS), and HFA-ICOS trastuzumab proforma) to 629 women (mean age 52.4 +/- 10.9 years) with Stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer treated with trastuzumab +/- anthracyclines to assess their performance to identify CTRCD during or immediately post treatment. Using these models, patients were classified into CTRCD risk categories according to the pre-treatment characteristics. With NSABP-31 CRS and HFA-ICOS proformas, patients in the highest risk category had a 1.7-to-2.4-fold higher relative risk of CTRCD than the low-risk category (p = 0.010 and 0.005, respectively). However, with all three risk models, those in the low-risk category had a high absolute risk of CTRCD (15.5-25.5%). The discrimination of the models for CTRCD (AUC 0.51-0.60) and their calibration was limited. NSAP-31 CRS and HFA-ICOS proformas can identify relative differences in CTRCD risk between patients, but when considering absolute risk, they are only able to identify the highest risk patients. There remains an ongoing need for accurate CTRCD risk prediction models in women with HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available