4.7 Article

Improving Adherence to Myofunctional Therapy in the Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245772

Keywords

obstructive sleep apnoea; myofunctional therapy; adherence; apnea hypopnea index; Iowa oral performance instrument

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Myofunctional therapy (MT) delivered through a mobile health app had good adherence and was effective in improving the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), with improvements correlating with tongue strength and tongue-tie improvement.
Myofunctional therapy (MT) is used to treat sleep-disordered breathing. However, MT has low adherence-only similar to 10% in most studies. We describe our experiences with MT delivered through a mobile health app named Airway Gym(R), which is used by patients who have rejected continuous positive airway pressure and other therapies. We compared ear, nose, and throat examination findings, Friedman stage, tongue-tie presence, tongue strength measured using the Iowa oral performance instrument (IOPI), and full polysomnography before and after the 3 months of therapy. Participants were taught how to perform the exercises using the app at the start. Telemedicine allowed physicians to record adherence to and accuracy of the exercise performance. Fifty-four patients were enrolled; 35 (64.8%) were adherent and performed exercises for 15 min/day on five days/week. We found significant changes (p < 0.05) in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI; 32.97 +/- 1.8 to 21.9 +/- 14.5 events/h); IOPI score (44.4 +/- 11.08 to 49.66 +/- 10.2); and minimum O-2 saturation (80.91% +/- 6.1% to 85.09% +/- 5.3%). IOPI scores correlated significantly with AHI after the therapy (Pearson r = 0.4; p = 0.01). The 19 patients who did not adhere to the protocol showed no changes. MT based on telemedicine had good adherence, and its effect on AHI correlated with IOPI and improvement in tongue-tie.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available