4.7 Article

Psychological Flexibility Mediates Wellbeing for People with Adverse Childhood Experiences during COVID-19

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020377

Keywords

COVID-19; pandemic; adverse childhood experiences; ACEs; psychological flexibility; wellbeing; mental health; psychological distress; Ireland

Funding

  1. Health Research Board
  2. Irish Research Council [COV19-2020-044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that individuals with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) reported significantly increased psychological distress over time during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to those without ACEs. Psychological flexibility was strongly associated with decreases in psychological distress and improved wellbeing. It also played a significant mediating role in the relationship between ACEs and wellbeing.
Background: The psychological impact of COVID-19 is multifaceted, both acute and chronic, and has not affected everyone equally. Method: This longitudinal study compared those with and without Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) on measures of psychological distress and wellbeing over time. Results: All groups (No ACE, Low ACE, and High ACE) had similar levels of distress at Time 1, with significant increases in psychological distress for those with ACEs over time, but not for those without. Psychological Flexibility was strongly and significantly associated with decreases in psychological distress and improved wellbeing. It significantly mediated the relationship between ACE and wellbeing. Conclusions: Those with ACEs report significantly increased psychological distress over time, compared to those without ACE during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence-based interventions using Psychological Flexibility may improve mental health and wellbeing to help further mediate its effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available