4.7 Review

Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235538

Keywords

non-obstructive azoospermia; sperm retrieval; male infertility; microTESE; prediction model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current prediction models for successful sperm retrieval in patients with NOA lack strong accuracy for clinical application, and further research is needed to improve precision. While certain factors may influence the success rate, no specific clinical or laboratory marker can definitively determine if a patient is suitable for a particular treatment.
Several prediction models for successful sperm retrieval (SSR) in patients with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction (also termed non-obstructive azoospermia-NOA) have been developed and published in the past years, however their resulting prediction accuracy has never been strong enough to translate their results in the clinical practice. This notwithstanding, the number of prediction models being proposed in this field is growing. We have reviewed the available evidence and found that, although patients with complete AZFc deletion or a history of cryptorchidism may have better probability of SSR compared to those with idiopathic NOA, no clinical or laboratory marker is able to determine whether a patient with NOA should or should not undergo microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to have his testicular sperm retrieved. Further research is warranted to confirm the utility of evaluating the expression of noncoding RNAs in the seminal plasma, to individuate patients with NOA with higher probability of SSR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available