4.7 Review

Novel targets, treatments, and advanced models for intracerebral haemorrhage

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103880

Keywords

Animal models; Brain haemorrhage; Aetiology; Haematoma; Inflammation; Recovery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a common type of stroke that contributes to mortality and disability globally. Despite progress in surgical interventions and acute ICH management, there is a lack of effective therapies to improve patient outcomes. Recent research has uncovered new pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ICH, but gaps in animal models hinder their application. This review emphasizes the importance of understanding ICH etiology, the role of the haematoma, inflammation, and post-ICH pathology, as well as the involvement of other cell types and organs in successful interventions.
Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the second most common type of stroke and a major cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Despite advances in surgical interventions and acute ICH management, there is currently no effective therapy to improve functional outcomes in patients. Recently, there has been tremendous progress uncovering new pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ICH that may pave the way for the development of therapeutic interventions. Here, we highlight emerging targets, but also existing gaps in preclinical animal modelling that prevent their exploitation. We particularly focus on (1) ICH aetiology, (2) the haematoma, (3) inflammation, and (4) post-ICH pathology. It is important to recognize that beyond neurons and the brain, other cell types and organs are crucially involved in ICH pathophysiology and successful interventions likely will need to address the entire organism. This review will spur the development of successful therapeutic interventions for ICH and advanced animal models that better reflect its aetiology and pathophysiology. Copyright (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available