4.7 Review

MUC2 and related bacterial factors: Therapeutic targets for ulcerative colitis

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103751

Keywords

MUC2; Mucus barrier; Dysbiosis; Microbiota transplantation; Ulcerative colitis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400659]
  2. Scientific Research Funding Project of Liaoning Educational Committee [QN2019017]
  3. Shenyang Youth Science and Technology Project [RC190495]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The MUC2 mucus barrier plays a crucial role in ulcerative colitis (UC). Interventions such as dietary adjustment, repair of the mucus barrier, microbiota transplantation, and targeted elimination of pathogenic bacteria can reduce the occurrence and recurrence of UC, maintaining a long-term remission period.
The mucin2 (MUC2) mucus barrier acts as the first barrier that prevents direct contact between intestinal bacteria and colonic epithelial cells. Bacterial factors related to the MUC2 mucus barrier play important roles in the response to changes in dietary patterns, MUC2 mucus barrier dysfunction, contact stimulation with colonic epithelial cells, and mucosal and submucosal inflammation during the occurrence and development of ulcerative colitis (UC). In this review, these underlying mechanisms are summarized and updated, and related interventions for treating UC, such as dietary adjustment, exogenous repair of the mucus barrier, microbiota transplantation and targeted elimination of pathogenic bacteria, are suggested. Such interventions are likely to induce and maintain a long and stable remission period and reduce or even avoid the recurrence of UC. A better mechanistic understanding of the MUC2 mucus barrier and its related bacterial factors may help researchers and clinicians to develop novel approaches for treating UC. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available