4.7 Article

Gut microbiome is associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy in hepatobiliary cancers

Journal

JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003334

Keywords

immunotherapy; liver neoplasms; tumor biomarkers

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3332020084, 3332018032]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Projects [2016YFE0107100]
  3. Capital Special Research Project for Health Development [2014-2-4012]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [L172055, 7192158]
  5. National Ten-thousand Talent Program
  6. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (CIFMS) [2017-I2M-4-003, 2018-I2M-3-001]
  7. Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan [CKCY20180323174659823]
  8. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [81802735]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the relationship between gut microbiome and clinical response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Taxonomic signatures enriched in responders were effective biomarkers to predict the clinical response and survival benefit of immunotherapy. Functional annotation indicated that taxa associated with different metabolic pathways may modulate the clinical response to immunotherapy in hepatobiliary cancers.
Background The gut microbiome is associated with the response to immunotherapy for different cancers. However, the impact of the gut microbiome on hepatobiliary cancers receiving immunotherapy remains unknown. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome and the clinical response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy in patients with advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Methods Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma or advanced biliary tract cancers who have progressed from first-line chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) were enrolled. Fresh stool samples were collected before and during anti-PD-1 treatment and analyzed with metagenomic sequencing. Significantly differentially enriched taxa and prognosis associated taxa were identified. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database and MetaCyc database were further applied to annotate the differentially enriched taxa to explore the potential mechanism of the gut microbiome influencing cancer immunotherapy. Results In total, 65 patients with advanced hepatobiliary cancers receiving anti-PD-1 treatment were included in this study. Seventy-four taxa were significantly enriched in the clinical benefit response (CBR) group and 40 taxa were significantly enriched in the non-clinical benefit (NCB) group. Among these taxa, patients with higher abundance of Lachnospiraceae bacterium-GAM79 and Alistipes sp Marseille-P5997, which were significantly enriched in the CBR group, achieved longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with lower abundance. Higher abundance of Ruminococcus calidus and Erysipelotichaceae bacterium-GAM147 enriched in the CBR group was also observed in patients with better PFS. In contrast, worse PFS and OS were found in patients with higher abundance of Veillonellaceae, which was significantly enriched in the NCB group. Functional annotation indicated that the taxa enriched in the CBR group were associated with energy metabolism while the taxa enriched in the NCB group were associated with amino acid metabolism, which may modulate the clinical response to immunotherapy in hepatobiliary cancers. In addition, immunotherapy-related adverse events were affected by the gut microbiome diversity and relative abundance. Conclusions We demonstrate that the gut microbiome is associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with hepatobiliary cancers. Taxonomic signatures enriched in responders are effective biomarkers to predict the clinical response and survival benefit of immunotherapy, which might provide a new therapeutic target to modulate the response to cancer immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available