4.8 Article

Three-dimensional coherent X-ray diffraction imaging via deep convolutional neural networks

Journal

NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00644-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012704]
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  3. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DMR-9724294]
  4. EPSRC
  5. National Science Foundation [DMR-9724294]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a 3D machine learning model that combines supervised learning with transfer learning to address the challenges in phase retrieval, demonstrating significantly improved performance compared to traditional iterative phase retrieval algorithms.
As a critical component of coherent X-ray diffraction imaging (CDI), phase retrieval has been extensively applied in X-ray structural science to recover the 3D morphological information inside measured particles. Despite meeting all the oversampling requirements of Sayre and Shannon, current phase retrieval approaches still have trouble achieving a unique inversion of experimental data in the presence of noise. Here, we propose to overcome this limitation by incorporating a 3D Machine Learning (ML) model combining (optional) supervised learning with transfer learning. The trained ML model can rapidly provide an immediate result with high accuracy which could benefit real-time experiments, and the predicted result can be further refined with transfer learning. More significantly, the proposed ML model can be used without any prior training to learn the missing phases of an image based on minimization of an appropriate 'loss function' alone. We demonstrate significantly improved performance with experimental Bragg CDI data over traditional iterative phase retrieval algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available