4.8 Article

In situ detection of water on the Moon by the Chang'E-5 lander

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl9174

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CAS [XDB 41000000, ZDBS-SSW-JSC007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11941001, 41902318]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDJ-SSW-DQC001]
  4. Key Research Program of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS [IGGCAS-201905]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of reflectance spectra from the Chang'E-5 lander reveals that lunar regolith samples from the Northern Oceanus Procellarum contain up to 120 ppm of water, mostly attributed to solar wind implantation. A light-colored rock named CE5-Rock near the lander exhibits stronger absorption and potentially contains around 180 ppm of water, suggesting an additional water source from the lunar interior. The low water content of the regolith may indicate degassing of the mantle reservoir beneath the Chang'E-5 landing site.
We report analysis results of the reflectance spectra (0.48 to 3.2.m) acquired by the Chang'E-5 lander, which provides vital context of the returned samples from the Northern Oceanus Procellarum of the Moon. We estimate up to 120 parts per million (ppm) of water (OH + H2O) in the lunar regolith, which is mostly attributed to solar wind implantation. A light-colored and surface-pitted rock (named as CE5-Rock) is evident near the lander. The reflectance spectra suggest that CE5-Rock could be transported from an older basalt unit. CE5-Rock exhibits a stronger absorption, near 2.85.m, than the surrounding regolith, with estimation of similar to 180 ppm of water if the model for estimating water content of regolith is applicable to rock samples, which may suggest an additional source from the lunar interior. The low water content of the regolith may suggest the degassing of mantle reservoir beneath the Chang'E-5 landing site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available