4.8 Article

Near-wall rheotaxis of the ciliate Tetrahymena induced by the kinesthetic sensing of cilia

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 43, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi5878

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19KK0180, 17J10331, 17H00853, 21H04999, 26707020, 21K03855]
  2. JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced Research Networks
  3. Kurita Water and Environment Foundation [20E028]
  4. NIBB Collaborative Research Program [20-501]
  5. Human Frontier Science Program [LT000013/2019-C]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21H04999, 17J10331, 26707020, 19KK0180, 21K03855] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-celled microorganism Tetrahymena responds autonomously to shear flow through rheotaxis by utilizing cilia-stalling mechanics, enabling it to survive in harsh environments effectively.
To survive in harsh environments, single-celled microorganisms autonomously respond to external stimuli, such as light, heat, and flow. Here, we elucidate the flow response of Tetrahymena, a well-known single-celled freshwater microorganism. Tetrahymena moves upstream against an external flow via a behavior called rheotaxis. While micrometer-sized particles are swept away downstream in a viscous flow, what dynamics underlie the rheotaxis of the ciliate? Our experiments reveal that Tetrahymena slides along walls during upstream movement, which indicates that the cells receive rotational torque from shear flow to control cell orientation. To evaluate the effects of the shear torque and propelling speed, we perform a numerical simulation with a hydrodynamic model swimmer adopting cilia dynamics in a shear flow. The swimmer orientations converge to an upstream alignment, and the swimmer slides upstream along a boundary wall. The results suggest that Tetrahymena automatically responds to shear flow by performing rheotaxis using cilia-stalling mechanics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available