4.6 Article

High areal capacity, long cycle life 4 V ceramic all-solid-state Li-ion batteries enabled by chloride solid electrolytes

Journal

NATURE ENERGY
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 83-93

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00952-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, an Energy Innovation Hub - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences
  2. NSERC via their Canada Research Chair programme
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [03XP0177D/03XP0228C]
  5. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of new lithium mixed-metal chlorospinels are reported as solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries, which exhibit high ionic conductivity and low electronic conductivity, showing potential for high-performance all-solid-state lithium batteries.
All-solid-state Li batteries (ASSBs) employing inorganic solid electrolytes offer improved safety and are exciting candidates for next-generation energy storage. Herein, we report a family of lithium mixed-metal chlorospinels, Li2InxSc0.666-xCl4 (0 <= x <= 0.666), with high ionic conductivity (up to 2.0 mS cm(-1)) owing to a highly disordered Li-ion distribution, and low electronic conductivity (4.7 x 10(-10) S cm(-1)), which are implemented for high-performance ASSBs. Owing to the excellent interfacial stability of the SE against uncoated high-voltage cathode materials, ASSBs utilizing LiCoO2 or LiNi0.85Co0.1Mn0.05O2 exhibit superior rate capability and long-term cycling (up to 4.8 V versus Li+/Li) compared to state-of-the-art ASSBs. In particular, the ASSB with LiNi0.85Co0.1Mn0.05O2 exhibits a long life of >3,000 cycles with 80% capacity retention at room temperature. High cathode loadings are also demonstrated in ASSBs with stable capacity retention of >4 mAh cm(-2) (similar to 190 mAh g(-1)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available