4.6 Article

Downstream of the CO2 Electrolyzer: Assessing the Energy Intensity of Product Separation

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages 4405-4412

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02263

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. TotalEnergies SE [TotalEnergies Research & Technology Feluy]
  3. Natural Resources Canada Clean Growth Program
  4. Canada Research Chairs Program
  5. NSERC
  6. Government of Ontario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the downstream purification of ethylene produced from the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide, highlighting the energy-intensive CO2 removal step. Opportunities to reduce separation energy through improvements in ethylene selectivity, CO2 conversion, and CO2 crossover are identified, emphasizing the need for new, efficient separation processes tailored to CO2 electrolyzer outlet streams.
The electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2RR) to chemical feedstocks, such as ethylene (C2H4), is an attractive means to mitigate emissions and store intermittent renewable electricity. Much research has focused on improving CO2 electrolysis cell efficiency; less attention has been paid to the downstream purification of outlet product streams. In this work, we model the use of mature downstream separation technologies as part of the overall production of polymer-grade C2H4 from CO2. We find that CO2 removal is the most energy-intensive downstream separation step. We identify opportunities to reduce separation energies to similar to 22 GJ/tonne C2H4 through necessary improvements in C2H4 selectivity (>57%), cathodic CO2 conversion (>80%), and CO2 crossover (0 mol CO2/mol e-). This work highlights the influence of cell performance parameters on downstream separation costs and motivates the development of new, efficient separation processes better suited to the distinctive outlet streams of CO2 electrolyzers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available