4.7 Article

Sustainability assessment of port cities with a hybrid model-empirical evidence from China

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103301

Keywords

Port city sustainability; THPD; Sustainability assessment; Interdependent sustainable system; Objective weights

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71774019]
  2. Talent Project of Revitalizing Liaoning [XLYC1807097]
  3. Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [19JHQ096]
  4. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2020-HYLH-30]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3132021506]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sustainability of port cities is crucial for their competitiveness and affects city development. This paper uses a hybrid model to evaluate 21 port cities in China quantitatively, finding a medium level of sustainability and indicating areas for improvement.
Port city is an important part of marine economic activities, whose development contributes to the connection of economic and environment between home and abroad. Sustainability of port cities not only can enhance the competitiveness of port cities, but also affects the city development process and characteristics. Therefore, it is pivotal to evaluate sustainability of port cities in advance. However, existing research on sustainable port cities is quite limited. And most of them are limited to the qualitative perspective, with little quantitative analysis. Therefore, this paper adopts a novel hybrid model THPD to evaluate sustainable port cities, expanding sustainability theories by taking port cities as research object. 21 port cities in China are selected for quantitative study. The results display that the sustainable level of port cities in China is at a medium level. The weaknesses and critical factors are varied, which points out the improvement direction for sustainable port cities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available