4.7 Article

Investigation of the microbiota associated with traditionally produced fruit vinegars with focus on acetic acid bacteria and lactic acid bacteria

Journal

FOOD BIOSCIENCE
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101636

Keywords

Microbial characterization; Acetic acid bacteria; Fig; Mulberry; Plum; Fruit vinegar

Funding

  1. Ege University Scientific Research Project Commission [16-MUH-116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microbiological properties of traditionally produced fruit vinegars from different cities in Turkey were investigated. Various species of acetic acid bacteria (AAB) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were identified and characterized in the vinegar samples. This study provides potential strains for use as starter cultures in the food industry.
The microbiological properties of traditionally produced fruit vinegars, i.e., fig, mulberry, apple and plum vinegars, supplied from different cities in Turkey were investigated. The counts of acetic acid bacteria (AAB), lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and mold -yeast for fruit vinegars were found in the range of 2.54-7.05, 1.91-6.81 and 1.32-7.10 log CFU/mL, respectively. The indigenous AAB and LAB isolates were recovered from the vinegars and characterized based on a combination of phenotypic and genotypic approaches including 16S rRNA gene sequencing. In AAB three different species, Acetobacter pasteurianus, A. ghanensis and A. fabarum, and in LAB five species, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, Leuconostoc sp. and Weisella confusa were identified in the vinegar samples. It was the first study reporting the identification of A. fabarum and Leuconostoc sp., which were isolated from fig vinegar. The results of the study showed that A. pasteurianus and L. paracasei were predominant species found in vinegar samples. The study provides potential strains which may be used as starter cultures in food industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available