4.6 Article

The Assessment of the Usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Healing Process Bone Resorption

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12020247

Keywords

platelet-rich fibrin; guided bone regeneration; bone preservation; cone beam computed tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main objective of this study was to explore the application of PRF in dental surgery to prevent changes in alveolar height and width after tooth extraction. The research involved 50 patients who underwent extraction of two corresponding teeth, with one alveolus filled with PRF while the other one left empty. Results showed that the PRF group displayed better healing of soft tissues and higher quality of newly formed bone after six months.
The main subject of this research was the use of PRF in dental surgery aimed at preventing changes in alveolar height and width after tooth extraction. Due to the large growth factor content, it seems to be particularly useful in bone loss management starting from the simplest loss occurring after tooth extraction through loss resulting from tooth resection ending with loss caused by large bone cysts. The study was performed on 50 patients. The extraction of two maxillary or mandibular homonymous teeth was carried out in each patient, where PRF was placed in one alveolus while the other alveolus was left empty. Then, the alveoli were surgically managed with a split flap technique. On the extraction day, after 10 days, and after 6 months, the alveolar process was measured, soft tissues healing was assessed, and imaging examinations were analyzed. It was proved that the healing of soft tissues in the PRF group was better. In the PRF group after 6 months from surgery, the newly formed bone had higher grayscale values in volumetric tomography (CBCT). Moreover, the reduced atrophy of the alveolar process at the site of the extracted tooth was proved in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available