4.7 Article

The chitosan-based bioactive composite coating on titanium

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 4461-4474

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.072

Keywords

Coating; Hydroxyapatite; Chitosan; Graphene; Bioactivity; Gentamicin

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-9/2021-14/200135, 451-03-9/2021-14/200287]
  2. European Commission [952033, H2020-WIDESPREAD-2018-2020/H2020-WIDESP READ-2020-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed composite coatings based on chitosan using EPD method, and confirmed their bioactivity and biocompatibility through various analytical techniques, while also monitoring the release of gentamicin.
This paper describes a promising electrophoretic deposition (EPD) approach for developing composite coatings based on chitosan with the additional components of hydroxyapatite, graphene, and gentamicin on titanium substrate. Bioactive properties were investigated in vitro by immersing the coatings in simulated body fluid (SBF) at 37 degrees C. The newly formed biomimetic layer on the top of the deposited chitosan-based coatings on Ti was confirmed by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy and electrochemical measurements, while coatings' bioactivity was proved by alkaline phosphatase activity assay in MRC-5 and L929 tested cell lines. The biocompatibility towards MRC-5 and L929 cell lines was investigated by dye exclusion test (DET) implying the non-cytotoxic effect of coatings. Gentamicin release studies were monitored during 21-day by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, indicating rapid release of gentamicin (approximate to 40%) in the first 48 h and more than 60% after 14 days. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available