4.7 Article

Enhanced Molecular Type Permutation Shift Keying for Molecular Communication

Journal

IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 2722-2726

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LWC.2021.3113507

Keywords

Receivers; Modulation; Transmitters; Molecular communication (telecommunication); Wireless communication; Interference; Entropy; Molecular communication; inter-symbol interference; modulation; achievable rate

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61871190]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018B030306005]
  3. Open Research Fund of the National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University [2020D03]
  4. China Scholarship Council [202006150069]
  5. EPSRC [EP/P034284/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/P034284/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces molecular type permutation shift keying (MTPSK) and its enhanced version, which improve the achievable rate (AR) by using different permutations of molecular types. Numerical results show the advantage of this approach in combating interference.
Molecular type permutation shift keying (MTPSK) performs information transmission by the full permutations of different molecular types, which can combat the severe inter-symbol interference (ISI) in molecular communications. This letter proves that the achievable rate (AR) of MTPSK is restricted by its modulation principle and as a remedy proposes an enhanced (E-)MTPSK to improve the AR by conveying information through the permutations of partial molecular types. The exact and approximate ARs are derived for E-MTPSK, MTPSK, and molecular shift keying. Numerical results on ARs and bit error rates reveal the trade-off between the AR and ISI-mitigation capability, and that the proposed scheme can outperform the prevalent modulation counterparts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available