4.3 Article

100 YEARS OF VITAMIN D: Supraphysiological doses of vitamin D changes brainwave activity patterns in rats

Journal

ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EC-21-0457

Keywords

hypercalcemia; vitamin D; brainwaves; electrocardiogram

Funding

  1. PROPESP-UFPA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low plasma levels of vitamin D can lead to bone mineral changes and worsen certain diseases. Supplementation is necessary, but carries risks of toxicity. This study explores the effects of high doses of vitamin D on the brain and heart, providing valuable parameters for diagnosing symptoms of intoxication.
Low plasma levels of vitamin D causes bone mineral change that can precipitate osteopenia and osteoporosis and could aggravate autoimmune diseases, hypertension and diabetes. The demand for vitamin D supplementation becomes necessary; however, the consumption of vitamin D is not without risks, which its toxicity could have potentially serious consequences related to hypervitaminosis D, such as hypercalcemia and cerebral alterations. Thus, the present study describes the electroencephalographic changes caused by supraphysiological doses of vitamin D in the brain electrical dynamics and the electrocardiographic changes. After 4 days of treatment with vitamin D at a dose of 25,000 IU/kg, the serum calcium levels found were increased in comparison with the control group. The electrocorticogram analysis found a reduction in wave activity in the delta, theta, alpha and beta frequency bands. For ECG was observed changes with shortened QT follow-up, which could be related to serum calcium concentration. This study presented important evidence about the cerebral and cardiac alterations caused by high doses of vitamin D, indicating valuable parameters in the screening and decision-making process for diagnosing patients with symptoms suggestive of intoxication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available