4.5 Article

Electron Resonant Interaction With Whistler Waves Around Foreshock Transients and the Bow Shock Behind the Terminator

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021JA029820

Keywords

bow shock; whistler waves; foreshock transients

Funding

  1. NASA HGI grant [80NSSC21K0581]
  2. NASA [NAS5-02099]
  3. German Ministry for Economy and Technology
  4. German Center for Aviation and Space (DLR) [50 OC 0302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigation of electron energization at (and around) the Earth's bow shock is critical to our understanding of space weather and astrophysical phenomena. In this study, using THEMIS and ARTEMIS wave measurements, we quantified the nonlinear effects of resonant interactions between >= 100 eV electrons and intense coherent whistler waves, and found that trapped electrons can gain energy up to several hundreds of eV.
Investigation of electron energization at (and around) the Earth's bow shock is critical to our understanding of space weather and astrophysical phenomena. The traditional adiabatic mechanisms for such energization compete with transient wave-particle interactions there. One of the most intense wave modes resonating with electrons is the high-frequency whistler mode, which is widely observed at (and around) the Earth's bow shock. Here, we examine these interactions in the context of the strong magnetic field gradients often found near the bow shock and at foreshock transients. Using THEMIS and ARTEMIS wave measurements, we quantify the nonlinear effects of resonant interactions between >= 100 eV electrons and intense coherent whistler waves. Such nonlinear interactions include the electron phase trapping by waves. As a result, the trapped electrons gain an energy up to several hundreds of eV. We estimate the main characteristics of the proposed acceleration mechanism and discuss its applicability to realistic plasma and magnetic field distributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available