4.6 Article

Estimating Radiative Forcing With a Nonconstant Feedback Parameter and Linear Response

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 126, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JD034145

Keywords

radiative forcing; CMIP5; linear response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new algorithm for estimating time-evolving global forcing in climate models is proposed, taking into account the non-constancy of global feedbacks and providing stronger forcing estimates than previously assumed. Linear temperature response functions are demonstrated to be useful for predicting responses to future scenarios.
A new algorithm is proposed for estimating time-evolving global forcing in climate models. The method is a further development of the work of Forster et al. (2013), , taking into account the non-constancy of the global feedbacks. We assume that the non-constancy of this global feedback can be explained as a time-scale dependence, associated with linear temperature responses to the forcing on different time scales. With this method we obtain stronger forcing estimates than previously assumed for the representative concentration pathway experiments in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The reason for the higher future forcing is that the global feedback parameter is more negative at shorter time scales than at longer time scales, consistent with the equilibrium climate sensitivity increasing with equilibration time. Our definition of forcing provides a clean separation of forcing and response, and we find that linear temperature response functions estimated from experiments with abrupt quadrupling of CO2 ${\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ can be used to predict responses also for future scenarios. In particular, we demonstrate that for most models, the response to our new forcing estimate applied on the 21st century scenarios provides a global surface temperature up to year 2100 consistent with the output of coupled model versions of the respective model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available