4.6 Review

Surveying 80 Years of Psychodrama Research: A Scientometric Review

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780542

Keywords

psychodrama; Moreno; scientometry; systematic review; document co-citation; psychotherapy; keyword analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. NAP SUG [M4081597, 2015-2021]
  2. Ministry of Education, Singapore [RG55/18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research in psychodrama has flourished in various sub-fields, with increasing adoption of technology and integration with other psychotherapies. To improve research quality, greater transparency in reporting materials and data is recommended. Future research trends may involve more use of new technological methods, such as neuroimaging.
Almost a century after Jacob Levy Moreno pioneered the group practice of psychodrama, research in this area has flourished to include different sub-fields of study and psychodramatic intervention for various psychological conditions. By making use of scientometric analysis, particularly document citation analysis and keyword analysis, this study maps out dominant research domains in psychodrama since its inception. From these findings, projections of future research trends and an evaluation of psychodrama research are discussed. Generally, there has been an increased adoption of technology to facilitate psychodrama practice, along with an increasing integration of psychodramatic principles with other psychotherapies. To improve research in this area, this paper recommends greater transparency in the reporting of materials, processes and data used in publications. Finally, we encourage embracing new technological methods such as neuroimaging to provide greater insight into mechanisms of change in psychodrama. The field of psychodrama remains full of potential and innovations to be developed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available