4.5 Article

Formation of Ejecta and Dust Pond Deposits on Asteroid Vesta

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
Volume 126, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021JE006873

Keywords

ponds; Vesta; volatiles; ejecta melt; dust; fine-grained

Funding

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (under DLRDAAD PhD Fellowship)
  2. DLR Management Board Young Research Group Leader Program by the Executive Board Member for Space Research and Technology
  3. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dust and melt ponds have been studied on planetary bodies like Eros, Itokawa, and the Moon, with different formation mechanisms depending on regolith material properties and planetary body locations. On Vesta, two types of ponds have been identified - ejecta ponds near impact craters, and dust ponds with undulating surfaces displaced from the crater center. Formation processes for type 2 ponds on Vesta may involve localized seismic diffusion and volatile-induced fluidization, hindering smooth morphology.
Dust and melt ponds have been studied on planetary bodies including Eros, Itokawa, and the Moon. However, depending on the nature of the regolith material properties and the location of the planetary body, the formation mechanism of the ponded features varies. On Eros and Itokawa, ponded features are formed from dry regolith materials whereas on the Moon similar features are thought to be produced by ejecta melt. On the surface of Vesta, we have identified type 1, ejecta ponds, and type 2, dust ponds. On Vesta type 1 pond are located in the vicinity of ejecta melt of large impact craters. The material is uniformly distributed across the crater floor producing smooth pond surfaces which have a constant slope and shallow depth. The hosting crater of melt-like ponds has a low raised rim and is located on relatively low elevated regions. Whereas, the type 2 ponds on Vesta reveal an undulating surface that is frequently displaced from the crater center or extends toward the crater wall with an abruptly changing slope. We suggested that for the production of the type 2 ponds, localized seismic diffusion and volatile-induced fluidization may be responsible for Vesta. Due to Vesta's large size (in comparison to Eros and Itokawa), the surface may have experienced local-scale rare high-amplitude seismic diffusion which was sufficient to drift fine material. Similarly, short-lived volatile activities were capable to transfer dusty material on to the surface. Segregation and smoothing of transferred material lack further surface activities, hindering the formation of smooth morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available