4.6 Article

Metabolomic and Proteomic Analyses of Persistent Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.789485

Keywords

metabolic; proteomic; valvular atrial fibrillation; non-valvular atrial fibrillation; persistent atrial fibrillation

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Project of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University [Z2018B19]
  2. Jiangsu Province Hospital Clinical Improvement Program [JSPHMB-2020-4]
  3. 1.3 project for disciplines of excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University [2019HXFH029]
  4. Technology innovation research and development project of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau [2019-YF05-00183-SN]
  5. Major Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province, China [2021YFS0121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, dementia, and stroke. Proteomics and metabolomics analyses revealed distinct metabolite and protein profiles between valvular and non-valvular AF patients, indicating potential different mechanisms underlying the two types of AF. The study identified specific biomarkers and metabolic pathways associated with each type of AF, providing insights for prognosis and potential treatment strategies.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an abnormal heart rhythm related to an increased risk of heart failure, dementia, and stroke. The distinction between valvular and non-valvular AF remains a debate. In this study, proteomics and metabolomics were integrated to describe the dysregulated metabolites and proteins of AF patients relative to sinus rhythm (SR) patients. Totally 47 up-regulated and 41 down-regulated proteins in valvular AF, and 59 up-regulated and 149 down-regulated proteins in non-valvular AF were recognized in comparison to SR patients. Moreover, 58 up-regulated and 49 significantly down-regulated metabolites in valvular AF, and 47 up-regulated and 122 down-regulated metabolites in persistent non-valvular AF patients were identified in comparison to SR patients. Based on analysis of differential levels of metabolites and proteins, 15 up-regulated and 22 down-regulated proteins, and 13 up-regulated and 122 down-regulated metabolites in persistent non-valvular AF were identified relative to valvular AF. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed the altered proteins and metabolites were significantly related to multiple metabolic pathways, such as Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis. Interestingly, the enrichment pathways related to non-valvular AF were obviously different from those in valvular AF. For example, valvular AF was significantly related to Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis, but non-valvular AF was more related to Citrate cycle (TCA cycle). Correlation analysis between the differentially expressed proteins and metabolites was also performed. Several hub proteins with metabolites were identified in valvular AF and non-valvular AF. For example, Taurine, D-Threitol, L-Rhamnose, and DL-lactate played crucial roles in valvular AF, while Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoAlyase, and Deoxyuridine 5-triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase were crucial in non-valvular AF. Then two hub networks were recognized as potential biomarkers, which can effectively distinguish valvular AF and non-valvular persistent AF from SR samples, with areas under curve of 0.75 and 0.707, respectively. Hence, these metabolites and proteins can be used as potential clinical molecular markers to discriminate two types of AF from SR samples. In summary, this study provides novel insights to understanding the mechanisms of AF progression and identifying novel biomarkers for prognosis of non-valvular AF and valvular AF by using metabolomics and proteomics analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available