4.7 Article

Blockchain Mutability: Challenges and Proposed Solutions

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TOPICS IN COMPUTING
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1972-1986

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2019.2949510

Keywords

Blockchain; Bitcoin; Distributed ledger; Smart contracts; Blockchain; immutability; right to be forgotten; GDPR

Funding

  1. European Commission under the Horizon 2020 Programme (H2020), project CyberSec4Europe [830929]
  2. European Commission under the Horizon 2020 Programme (H2020), as part of the project LOCARD [832735]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blockchain has evolved rapidly over the past decade, with its immutability being questioned in light of the EU's GDPR Right to be Forgotten provision, posing a challenge for compliance while maintaining security. Various methods and techniques for mutable blockchains have been proposed to address this contradiction.
Blockchain's evolution during the past decade is astonishing: from bitcoin to over 2.000 altcoins, and from decentralised electronic payments to transactions programmable by smart contracts and complex tokens governed by decentralised organisations. While the new generation of blockchain applications is still evolving, blockchain's technical characteristics are also advancing. Yet, immutability, a hitherto indisputable and highly advertised property according to which blockchain data cannot be edited nor deleted, remains the cornerstone of blockchain's security. Nevertheless, blockchain's immutability is being called into question lately in the light of the new erasing requirements imposed by the GDPR's Right to be Forgotten (RtbF) provision. As the RtbF obliges blockchain data to be editable in order restricted content redactions, modifications or deletions to be applied when requested, blockchains compliance with the regulation is indeed challenging, if not impracticable. Towards resolving this contradiction, various methods and techniques for mutable blockchains have been proposed to satisfy regulatory erasing requirements while preserving blockchains' security. To this end, this work aims to provide a comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art research approaches, technical workarounds and advanced cryptographic techniques that have been put forward to resolve this conflict and to discuss their potentials, constraints and limitations when applied in the wild to either permissioned or permissionless blockchains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available