4.5 Article

Comparative Study of Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes Between Elderly Patients and Younger Patients Who Received Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Journal

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 603-613

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S350587

Keywords

radical cystectomy; elderly; survival outcomes; complications

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272829]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the perioperative and survival outcomes of patients over 75 years and younger patients who received radical cystectomy. It found that elderly patients aged >75 had worse survival outcomes, but age >75 was not a risk factor for major complications after radical cystectomy.
Purpose: To compare the perioperative and survival outcomes of patients over 75 years and younger patients who received radical cystectomy. Patients and methods: A total of 119 patients aged 0.001). Age 75 years was a risk factor for overall survival (HR = 1.69 [95% CI: 1.22-2.35]; p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.69 [95% CI: 1.14- 2.50]; p = 0.008) for patients who received radical cystectomy but was not a poor risk factor for major complications (HR = 1.25 [95% CI: 0.47-3.31]; p = 0.658) after radical cystectomy. In addition, preoperative renal insufficiency was associated with a higher risk of major complications. Conclusion: In our cohort, compared with younger patients, elderly patients aged >75 years had worse survival outcomes, but age >75 years was not a risk factor for major complications after radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. Radical surgery should be encouraged for elderly patients who can tolerate aggressive treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available