4.5 Article

LncRNA HLA-F-AS1 Enhances the Migration, Invasion and Apoptosis of Glioblastoma Cells by Targeting lncRNA MEG3

Journal

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 9139-9145

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S322351

Keywords

glioblastoma; HLA-F-AS1; MEG3; invasion; migration; apoptosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, it was found that HLA-F-AS1 was highly expressed and MEG3 was downregulated in GBM. HLA-F-AS1 promoted cell migration and invasion, while reducing cell apoptosis, while MEG3 played opposite roles and attenuated the effects of HLA-F-AS1.
Background: Previous studies revealed the oncogenic role of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) HLA-F-AS1 in colon cancer and breast cancer, while its role in other cancers is unclear. We predicted the direct interaction between HLA-F-AS1 and MEG3, which is a tumor suppressor lncRNA. We then assessed the interaction between HLA-F-AS1 and MEG3 in glioblastoma (GBM). Methods: The expression levels of HLA-F-AS1 and MEG3 in GBM and paired non-tumor tissues from 60 GBM patients were analyzed by RT-qPCR. Overexpression of HLA-F-AS1 and MEG3 was achieved in GBM cells to explore the interaction between them. The direct interaction between them was confirmed by RNA pull-down assay. The roles of HLA-F-AS1 and MEG3 in cell invasion, migration and apoptosis were explored by Transwell assays and cell apoptosis assay. Results: HLA-F-AS1 was highly expressed, and MEG3 was downregulated in GBM. Overexpression of HLA-F-AS1 reduced the expression levels of MEG3 while overexpression of MEG3 did not alter the expression of HLA-F-AS1. HLA-F-AS1 increased cell migration and invasion, but decreased cell apoptosis. MEG3 played opposite roles and reduced the effects of HLA-F-AS1 on cell behaviors. Conclusion: HLA-F-AS1 may sponge MEG3 in GBM cells to promote cell invasion and migration, and to suppress cell apoptosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available