4.7 Article

Effects of intermetallic compound layer thickness on the mechanical properties of silicon-copper interface

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110251

Keywords

Intermetallic compound; Mechanical property; Molecular dynamics; Silicon-copper interface

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51727901]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a Si/Cu composite interface model with different IMC layer thicknesses was established using molecular dynamics simulation. The Si/Cu interface was found to fail in a quasi-brittle fracture mode, with crack propagation along the Si/IMC interface. IMC was shown to increase the critical strain energy release rate, while the equivalent modulus did not increase monotonically.
Intermetallic compounds (IMC) are found in the dual-layer composite, such as Si/Cu composite in multilayer semiconductor structures, and are often ignored in simulations that aim to predict the mechanical properties. The interface model of Si/Cu composites with different thickness of IMC layer is first established by molecular dynamics simulation. Then this study analyzed the elastoplastic behavior and adhesion behavior of the Si/Cu interface and the effect of IMC on the fracture properties. The simulation results demonstrate that the Si/Cu interface fails in a quasi-brittle fracture mode. The crack propagates along the interface between Si and the IMC layer. An apparent dislocation emission and large plastic deformation are found exclusively in the Cu layer. The thickness of the IMC layer increased from 2 to 10 angstrom, and the critical strain energy release rate increased from 14.481/m(2) to 19.761/m(2), while the equivalent modulus is not increase monotonically. Therefore, the IMC is of high significance for predicting the mechanical properties of the dual-layer composite. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available