4.5 Article

Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Journal

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 9-20

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S333147

Keywords

deep learning; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; major or life-threatening bleeding complications; prediction model

Funding

  1. National Major Science and Technology Projects [2018AAA0100201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81970325, 61906127]
  3. 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
  4. Science and Technology Achievement Transformation Fund of West China Hospital of Sichuan University [CGZH19009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a risk prediction model based on deep learning was developed to predict major or life-threatening bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The model outperformed traditional models in terms of discrimination and calibration, and showed great performance in stratifying high-and low-bleeding risk patients.
Purpose: Late major bleeding is one of the main complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model based on deep learning to predict major or life-threatening bleeding complications (MLBCs) after TAVR. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study including TAVR patients from West China Hospital of Sichuan University Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry (ChiCTR2000033419) between April 17, 2012 and May 27, 2020. A deep learning-based model named BLeNet was developed with 56 features covering baseline, procedural, and post-procedural characteristics. The model was validated with the bootstrap method and evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (c-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and Kaplan-Meier estimate. Captum interpretation library was applied to identify feature importance. The BLeNet model was compared with the traditional Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) model and the random survival forest model in the metrics mentioned above. Results: The BLeNet model outperformed the Cox-PH and random survival forest models significantly in discrimination [optimism-corrected c-index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92) vs 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.77) vs 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61-0.74)] and calibration (integrated calibration index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.007 vs 0.015 vs 0.019). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, BLeNet model had great performance in stratifying high-and low-bleeding risk patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Deep learning is a feasible way to build prediction models concerning TAVR prognosis. A dedicated bleeding risk prediction model was developed for TAVR patients to facilitate well-informed clinical decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available