4.6 Article

Real-World Data for Lenvatinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (ELEVATOR): A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Journal

LIVER CANCER
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 219-232

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000521746

Keywords

Lenvatinib; Hepatocellular carcinoma; REFLECT study; Real-world cohort; Liver function; Albumin-bilirubin grade

Funding

  1. EISAI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the efficacy of Lenvatinib in a multicenter cohort from Germany and Austria, showing that patients meeting the inclusion criteria had better survival outcomes. Impaired liver function and other factors had a significant impact on survival time.
Background: Lenvatinib is approved as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The efficacy of lenvatinib in Caucasian real-world patients is insufficiently defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib in a multicenter cohort (ELEVATOR) from Germany and Austria. Methods: We conducted a retrospective data analysis of 205 patients treated with first-line systemic lenvatinib at 14 different sites. Overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate, and adverse event rates were assessed and analyzed. Results: Pa- tients receiving lenvatinib in the real-world setting reached a median overall survival (mOS) of 12.8 months, which was comparable to the results reported from the REFLECT study. mOS and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were superior in those patients who met the inclusion criteria of the REFLECT study compared to patients who failed to meet the inclusion criteria (mOS 15.6 vs. 10.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.38-0.81, p = 0.002; mPFS 8.1 vs. 4.8 months, HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.91, p = 0.0015). For patients with an impaired liver function according to the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade or reduced ECOG performance status >= 2, survival was significantly shorter compared to patients with sustained liver function (ALBI grade 1) and good performance status (ECOG performance status 0), respectively (HR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.07-2.66, p = 0.023; HR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.19-4.23, p = 0.012). Additionally, macrovascular invasion (HR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.02-2.37,p= 0.041) and an AFP >= 200 ng/mL (HR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.03-2.34, p = 0.034) were confirmed as independent negative prognostic factors in our cohort of patients with advanced HCC. Conclusion: Overall, our data confirm the efficacy of lenvatinib and did not reveal new or unexpected side effects in a large retrospective Caucasian real-world cohort, supporting the use of lenvatinib as a meaningful alternative for patients that cannot be treated with IO-based combinations in first-line HCC. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available