4.7 Article

Self-testing quantum systems of arbitrary local dimension with minimal number of measurements

Journal

NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-021-00490-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Foundation for Polish Science through the First Team project - European Union under the European Regional Development Fund [First TEAM/2017-4/31]
  2. Homing programme of the Foundation for Polish Science - European Union under the European Regional Development Fund [POIR.04.04.00-00-5F4F/18-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bell nonlocality as a resource for device-independent certification schemes has been extensively studied, and a self-testing protocol for the maximally entangled state of any local dimension using the minimum number of measurements possible has been proposed, which can achieve unbounded randomness expansion and log 2d perfect random bits with only one random bit required for encoding measurement choice.
Bell nonlocality as a resource for device-independent certification schemes has been studied extensively in recent years. The strongest form of device-independent certification is referred to as self-testing, which given a device, certifies the promised quantum state as well as quantum measurements performed on it without any knowledge of the internal workings of the device. In spite of various results on self-testing protocols, it remains a highly nontrivial problem to propose a certification scheme of qudit-qudit entangled states based on violation of a single d-outcome Bell inequality. Here we address this problem and propose a self-testing protocol for the maximally entangled state of any local dimension using the minimum number of measurements possible, i.e., two per subsystem. Our self-testing result can be used to establish unbounded randomness expansion, log 2d perfect random bits, while it requires only one random bit to encode the measurement choice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available