4.3 Review

Current management of cancer pain in Italy: Expert opinion paper

Journal

OPEN MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 34-45

Publisher

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/med-2021-0393

Keywords

cancer pain; breakthrough cancer pain; multi-disciplinary team; rapid-onset opioids; fentanyl

Funding

  1. Angelini S.p.a.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite dedicated laws and effective treatments in Italy, a low percentage of specialists assess pain and BTcP with validated tools, and undertreatment of cancer pain remains prevalent globally. A multidisciplinary approach, more training programs for clinicians, personalized therapy drug formulations, and virtuous care pathways are essential for improving cancer pain management.
Introduction - Chronic pain and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) have a high prevalence in all cancer types and cancer stages, combined with a significant physical, psychological, and economic burden. Despite efforts to improve appropriate management of cancer pain, a poor assessment and guilty undertreatment are still reported in many countries. The purpose of this expert opinion paper is to contribute to reduce and clarify these issues with a multidisciplinary perspective in order to share virtuous paths of care. Methods - Common questions about cancer pain assessment and treatment were submitted to a multidisciplinary pool of Italian clinicians and the results were subsequently discussed and compared with the findings of the published literature. Conclusion - Despite a dedicated law in Italy and effective treatments available, a low percentage of specialists assess pain and BTcP, defining the intensity with validated tools. Moreover, in accordance with the findings of the literature in many countries, the undertreatment of cancer pain is still prevalent. A multidisciplinary approach, more training programs for clinicians, personalised therapy drug formulations, and virtuous care pathways will be essential to improve cancer pain management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available