Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis
Anneliese Arno et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2021)
Nonprescribed androgen use among women and trans men
Ingrid Amalia Havnes et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY (2021)
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)
Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review
B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Comparing machine and human reviewers to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials
Susan Armijo-Olivo et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2020)
Statistical stopping criteria for automated screening in systematic reviews
Max W. Callaghan et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2020)
A clustering approach for topic filtering within systematic literature reviews
Tim Weisser et al.
METHODSX (2020)
Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large-evidence systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Joshua R. Polanin et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2019)
Clustering of semantically enriched short texts
Marek Kozlowski et al.
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2019)
Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis
Iain J. Marshall et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2019)
Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide
Iain J. Marshall et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2018)
Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study
Piotr Przybyla et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2018)
Discriminating between empirical studies and nonempirical works using automated text classification
Alexis Langlois et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2018)
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
Rohit Borah et al.
BMJ OPEN (2017)
Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2015)
The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets
Takaya Saito et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews
Ian Shemilt et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2014)
Best fit framework synthesis: refining the method
Christopher Carroll et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2013)
'Clustering' documents automatically to support scoping reviews of research: a case study
Claire Stansfield et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2013)
Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
Hilda Bastian et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2010)
A survey of Web clustering engines
Claudio Carpineto et al.
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS (2009)
How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis
Kaveh G. Shojania et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2007)
Share Paper
