4.2 Article

Assessment of using electronic portal imaging device for analysing bolus material utilised in radiation therapy

Journal

OPEN CHEMISTRY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 61-68

Publisher

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/chem-2022-0126

Keywords

bolus; gamma analysis; flat panel detectors; electronic portal imaging device; radiation therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the feasibility of using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) as an analysing equipment for bolus material and found that EPID can be used to evaluate bolus material in daily use.
In this study, the feasibility of using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) as an analysing equipment for bolus material was evaluated in terms of its dosimetric parameters. Seven superflab bolus material samples, 4 samples of 0.5 cm (S1-S4) and 3 samples of 1 cm thickness (S5-S7), were analysed and compared with tissue equivalent water phantom, which was selected for reference material. Gamma analysis method was used to evaluate the dose distribution of the boluses. In addition, 487,204 point-dose values of each bolus were compared with the point-doses of corresponding reference material by using Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis. The passing rates varied from 58.3 to 100% for 0.5 cm thick samples, and on the other hand, the passing rates of all the 1 cm thick boluses were 100%. All the correlation coefficient values were above 0.975. The correlation was statistically significant for all the samples (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient of S4 bolus sample was the highest among the 0.5 cm thick bolus samples with a result of 0.989. Likewise, S5 and S6 bolus samples were the highest among the 1 cm thick ones with a result of 0.995. The results indicated that the material planned to be used as bolus can be evaluated with EPID in daily use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available