4.2 Article

Trace-element XAFS sensitivity: a stress test for a new XRF multi-detector

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages 1811-1819

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600577521008857

Keywords

X-ray fluorescence; fluorescence detector; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; geology

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

XAFS spectroscopy can assess the chemical speciation of elements, and a new multi-element X-ray fluorescence detector is designed to probe trace 3d element speciation, aiding in evaluating the impact of harmful metals on human health and ecosystems.
X-ray absorption fine-structure (XAFS) spectroscopy can assess the chemical speciation of the elements providing their coordination and oxidation state, information generally hidden to other techniques. In the case of trace elements, achieving a good quality XAFS signal poses several challenges, as it requires high photon flux, counting statistics and detector linearity. Here, a new multi-element X-ray fluorescence detector is presented, specifically designed to probe the chemical speciation of trace 3d elements down to the p.p.m. range. The potentialities of the detector are presented through a case study: the speciation of ultra-diluted elements (Fe, Mn and Cr) in geological rocks from a calcareous formation related to the dispersal processes from Ontong (Java) volcanism (mid-Cretaceous). Trace-elements speciation is crucial in evaluating the impact of geogenic and anthropogenic harmful metals on the environment, and to evaluate the risks to human health and ecosystems. These results show that the new detector is suitable for collecting spectra of 3d elements in trace amounts in a calcareous matrix. The data quality is high enough that quantitative data analysis could be performed to determine their chemical speciation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available