4.6 Article

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Spinal Muscular Atrophy Under Nusinersen Treatment-A Pilot Study

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.812063

Keywords

spinal muscular atrophy; nusinersen; Neuro-QoL; antisense oligonucleotide; HFMSE; RULM

Funding

  1. Universitaetsmedizin Essen Clinician Scientist Academy (UMEA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of nusinersen on the quality of life of adult SMA patients and found that despite significant improvements in motor function, patients' quality of life did not increase significantly. This highlights the need for novel, disease-specific assessments of quality of life in SMA.
5q-Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severely disabling inherited neuromuscular disease that progressively reduces the motor abilities of affected individuals. The approval of the antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen, which has been shown to improve motor function in adult SMA patients, changed the treatment landscape. However, little is known about its impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), and there is still a need for adequate patient-reported outcome measures. In this study, we used the short form of the Neuro-QoL (Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders) for upper/lower extremity function to prospectively assess the health-related QoL of 17 adult SMA patients prior to initiation of nusinersen treatment and 2, 6, 10, and 14 months afterwards. At baseline, Neuro-QoL scores strongly correlated with motor function scores (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded, HFMSE; Revised Upper Limb Module, RULM), but QoL did not increase significantly during the 14-month treatment period despite significant motor improvement as measured by HFMSE. Our results underline the need for novel, disease-specific assessments of QoL in SMA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available