4.7 Article

Fanconi anemia gene-associated germline predisposition in aplastic anemia and hematologic malignancies

Journal

FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 459-466

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11684-021-0841-x

Keywords

Fanconi anemia; aplastic anemia; hematologic malignancy; germline predisposition

Funding

  1. Shandong Nature Science Fund [ZR2016HP02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that heterozygous mutations in Fanconi anemia genes can contribute to hematologic disorders, particularly aplastic anemia and leukemia. Different genes have varying frequencies of mutations, with some genes showing associations with specific subgroups of hematologic malignancies.
Whether Fanconi anemia (FA) heterozygotes are predisposed to bone marrow failure and hematologic neoplasm is a crucial but unsettled issue in cancer prevention and family consulting. We retrospectively analyzed rare possibly significant variations (PSVs) in the five most obligated FA genes, BRCA2, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, and FANCG, in 788 patients with aplastic anemia (AA) and hematologic malignancy. Sixty-eight variants were identified in 66 patients (8.38%). FANCA was the most frequently mutated gene (n = 29), followed by BRCA2 (n = 20). Compared with that of the ExAC East Asian dataset, the overall frequency of rare PSVs was higher in our cohort (P = 0.016). BRCA2 PSVs showed higher frequency in acute lymphocytic leukemia (P = 0.038), and FANCA PSVs were significantly enriched in AA and AML subgroups (P = 0.020; P = 0.008). FA-PSV-positive MDS/AML patients had a higher tumor mutation burden, higher rate of cytogenetic abnormalities, less epigenetic regulation, and fewer spliceosome gene mutations than those of FA-PSV-negative MDS/AML patients (P = 0.024, P = 0.029, P = 0.024, and P = 0.013). The overall PSV enrichment in our cohort suggests that heterozygous mutations of FA genes contribute to hematopoietic failure and leukemogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available