4.8 Article

Noninvasive Immuno-PET Imaging of CD8+ T Cell Behavior in Influenza A Virus-Infected Mice

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.777739

Keywords

immuno-PET; influenza A virus; CD8; T cells; imaging

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immuno-positron emission tomography (immuno-PET) is a noninvasive imaging method that allows for tracking immune cells in living animals. In a study using mouse models, CD8(+) T cells labeled with a Zr-89 nanobody showed specific migration patterns during an influenza A virus infection, suggesting a potential role in immune response modulation.
Immuno-positron emission tomography (immuno-PET) is a noninvasive imaging method that enables tracking of immune cells in living animals. We used a nanobody that recognizes mouse CD8 alpha and labeled it with Zr-89 to image mouse CD8(+) T cells in the course of an infection with influenza A virus (IAV). The CD8(+) signal showed a strong increase in the mediastinal lymph node (MLN) and thymus as early as 4 days post-infection (dpi), and as early as 6 dpi in the lungs. Over the course of the infection, CD8(+) T cells were at first distributed diffusely throughout the lungs and then accumulated more selectively in specific regions of the lungs. These distributions correlated with morbidity as mice reached the peak of weight loss over this interval. CD8(+) T cells obtained from control or IAV-infected mice showed a difference in their distribution and migration when comparing their fate upon labeling ex vivo with Zr-89-labeled anti-CD8 alpha nanobody and transfer into infected versus control animals. CD8(+) T cells from infected mice, upon transfer, appear to be trained to persist in the lungs, even of uninfected mice. Immuno-PET imaging thus allows noninvasive, dynamic monitoring of the immune response to infectious agents in living animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available