4.8 Article

Comparative Magnitude and Persistence of Humoral SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Responses in the Adult Population in Germany

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.828053

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; mRNA vaccines; vector-based vaccines; variants of concern; protective immunity; population-based study; longitudinal study; antibody persistence

Categories

Funding

  1. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres [SO-96]
  2. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [101003480 - CORESMA]
  3. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
  4. State Ministry of Baden-Wurttemberg for Economic Affairs, Labour and Tourism [FKZ 3-4332.62-NMI-67, FKZ 3-4332.62-NMI-68]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent increases in SARS-CoV-2 infections have raised questions about the duration and quality of vaccine-induced immune protection. This study analyzed samples from a large population-based seroprevalence study in Germany and found that mRNA-based or heterologous prime-boost vaccination resulted in higher antibody responses compared to vector-based homologous vaccination. Previously infected individuals had a robust immune response after vaccination, regardless of the vaccine received.
Recent increases in SARS-CoV-2 infections have led to questions about duration and quality of vaccine-induced immune protection. While numerous studies have been published on immune responses triggered by vaccination, these often focus on studying the impact of one or two immunisation schemes within subpopulations such as immunocompromised individuals or healthcare workers. To provide information on the duration and quality of vaccine-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, we analyzed antibody titres against various SARS-CoV-2 antigens and ACE2 binding inhibition against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and variants of concern in samples from a large German population-based seroprevalence study (MuSPAD) who had received all currently available immunisation schemes. We found that homologous mRNA-based or heterologous prime-boost vaccination produced significantly higher antibody responses than vector-based homologous vaccination. Ad26.CoV2S.2 performance was particularly concerning with reduced titres and 91.7% of samples classified as non-responsive for ACE2 binding inhibition, suggesting that recipients require a booster mRNA vaccination. While mRNA vaccination induced a higher ratio of RBD- and S1-targeting antibodies, vector-based vaccines resulted in an increased proportion of S2-targeting antibodies. Given the role of RBD- and S1-specific antibodies in neutralizing SARS-CoV-2, their relative over-representation after mRNA vaccination may explain why these vaccines have increased efficacy compared to vector-based formulations. Previously infected individuals had a robust immune response once vaccinated, regardless of which vaccine they received, which could aid future dose allocation should shortages arise for certain manufacturers. Overall, both titres and ACE2 binding inhibition peaked approximately 28 days post-second vaccination and then decreased.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available