4.3 Article

Multi-attribute group decision making based on Choquet integral under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment

Journal

Publisher

ATLANTIS PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2016.1146530

Keywords

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral; interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets; interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy measure; multiple attribute group decision making

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71171048, 71371049]
  2. Ph.D. Program Foundation of Chinese Ministry of Education [20120092110038]
  3. Scientific Research and Innovation Project for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ13_0138]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1454]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we propose new methods to represent interdependence among alternative attributes and experts' opinions by constructing Choquet integral using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. In the sequel, we apply these methods to solve the multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. First, the concept of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral is defined, and some elementary properties are studied in detail. Next, an axiomatic system of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy measure is established by delivering a series of mathematical proofs. Then, with fuzzy entropy and Shapely-values in game theory, we propose the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy measure development methods in order to form the importance measure of attributes and correlation measure of the experts, respectively. Based on the results of theoretical analysis, a new method is proposed to handle the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making problems. A numerical example illustrates the procedure of the proposed methods and verifies the validity and effectiveness of our new proposed methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available