4.6 Review

Sensory Panel Performance Evaluation-Comprehensive Review of Practical Approaches

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Food Science & Technology

Remote testing: Sensory test during Covid-19 pandemic and beyond

Caterina Dinnella et al.

Summary: Restrictions imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the shift of data collection from the laboratory to remote sensory testing. A research project conducted by the Italian Sensory Science Society demonstrated that remote sensory testing is a promising alternative to lab testing, showing similar results when protocols are strictly followed. This method is suitable for both trained assessors and consumers, presenting a viable option beyond the global crisis.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2022)

Article Food Science & Technology

A comparative study of the main international extra virgin olive oil competitions: Their impact on producers and consumers

Catherine Rebufa et al.

Summary: Olive oil competitions reward the best oils, enhancing their commercial value and guiding consumers to explore taste diversity. Differences in competition methods may exclude some oils from fair participation, highlighting the importance of standardizing evaluation sheets. Consumer preferences for olive oil may differ from those of tasting experts, and competition results should assist consumers in choosing oils that best suit their tastes.

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2021)

Article Food Science & Technology

Application of a panel performance reliability versus product effect size (PR-ES) framework: A protein powder case study

Carla Kuesten et al.

Summary: The performance reliability of sensory descriptive panels and the treatment effect size of products are crucial in sensory analysis. This paper presents an industry case study with a full historical database spanning 10 years of protein studies, using the analysis framework of Performance Reliability versus Effect Size (PR-ES). The study utilizes various measures such as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach's coefficient alpha, Thurstonian d-prime, and R-index for analysis.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2021)

Review Food Science & Technology

Review on characteristics of trained sensory panels in food science

Ilija Djekic et al.

Summary: The study found that the majority of trained panels have between 8 to 12 members, with training sessions lasting less than 2 hours each. Some papers conducted training and validated the effectiveness of their training, with a significant number using intensity scales as descriptive methods.

JOURNAL OF TEXTURE STUDIES (2021)

Article Food Science & Technology

Alignment and Proficiency of Virgin Olive Oil Sensory Panels: The OLEUM Approach

Sara Barbieri et al.

FOODS (2020)

Article Food Science & Technology

Partial projective mapping and ultra-flash profile with and without red light: A case study with white wine

Amy M. Smith et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2019)

Article Food Science & Technology

Design of experiment with sensory data: A pragmatic data analysis approach

Nicolas Pineau et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2019)

Article Food Science & Technology

Sensory and volatile profiles of monofloral honeys produced by native stingless bees of the brazilian semiarid region

Ana Caroliny Vieira da Costa et al.

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2018)

Article Chemistry, Applied

Sensory analysis of cosmetic powders: personal care ingredients and emulsions

M. Moussour et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE (2017)

Article Food Science & Technology

CONS an R based graphical interface to perform Consonance Analysis

Victor M. Aguirre et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2017)

Article Food Science & Technology

Panel performance monitoring by Poincare plot: A case study on flavoured bottled waters

Laszlo Sipos et al.

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2017)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Sweet taste in apple: the role of sorbitol, individual sugars, organic acids and volatile compounds

Eugenio Aprea et al.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2017)

Article Food Science & Technology

Assessing sensory panel performance using generalizability theory

Paul Talsma

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2016)

Article Food Science & Technology

Taking individual scaling differences into account by analyzing profile data with the Mixed Assessor Model

Per Bruun Brockhoff et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2015)

Article Agricultural Engineering

Comparison of different Ocimum basilicum L. gene bank accessions analyzed by GC-MS and sensory profile

B. Bernhardt et al.

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS (2015)

Article Food Science & Technology

Canonical Variate Analysis of Sensory Profiling Data

C. Peltier et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2015)

Article Food Science & Technology

A method for panelists' consistency assessment in sensory evaluations based on the Cronbach's alpha coefficient

F. S. T. Pinto et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2014)

Article Food Science & Technology

The MAM-CAP table: A new tool for monitoring panel performances

C. Peltier et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2014)

Article Food Science & Technology

Panel performance for Temporal Dominance of Sensations

Melissa Lepage et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2014)

Article Food Science & Technology

Coherences of Instrumental and Sensory Characteristics: Case Study on Cherry Tomatoes

Laszlo Csambalik et al.

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE (2014)

Article Food Science & Technology

COMPARISON OF RESULTS FROM CUPPING AND DESCRIPTIVE SENSORY ANALYSIS OF COLOMBIAN BREWED COFFEE

B. Di Donfrancesco et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2014)

Article Agronomy

A combined sensory-instrumental tool for apple quality evaluation

Maria Laura Corollaro et al.

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY (2014)

Article Automation & Control Systems

Method and model comparison by sum of ranking differences in cases of repeated observations (ties)

Klara Kollar-Hunek et al.

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS (2013)

Article Agronomy

Importance of fruit variability in the assessment of apple quality by sensory evaluation

Cecile Bavay et al.

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)

Article Food Science & Technology

A comparison between nine laboratories performing triangle tests

Francois Sauvageot et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2012)

Article Automation & Control Systems

Comparison of novel sensory panel performance evaluation techniques with e-nose analysis integration

Laszlo Sipos et al.

JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS (2011)

Article Food Science & Technology

A PROCEDURE FOR SENSORY EVALUATION OF BREAD: PROTOCOL DEVELOPED BY A TRAINED PANEL

Monica Elia

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2011)

Article Food Science & Technology

Analysing sensory panel performance in a proficiency test using the PanelCheck software

Oliver Tomic et al.

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY (2010)

Article Food Science & Technology

Monte Carlo based test for inferring about the unidimensionality of a Brazilian coffee sensory panel

I. S. Amorim et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2010)

Article Food Science & Technology

Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis

Karima A. Moussaoui et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2010)

Article Automation & Control Systems

Testing panel consistency with GCAP method in food profile analysis

K. Kollar-Hunek et al.

JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS (2008)

Article Food Science & Technology

Sensominer: A package for sensory data analysis

Sebastien Le et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2008)

Article Automation & Control Systems

Multi-way models for sensory profiling data

Rasmus Bro et al.

JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS (2008)

Article Food Science & Technology

Modeling the evolution of the performance of a sensory panel: A mixed-model and control chart approach

Nicolas Pineau et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2007)

Article Food Science & Technology

Visualization of sensory profiling data for performance monitoring

Oliver Tomic et al.

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2007)

Article Food Science & Technology

Measurement of the reliability of sensory panel performances

J Latreille et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2006)

Article Food Science & Technology

Use of feedback calibration to reduce the training time for wine panels

CJ Findlay et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2006)

Article Food Science & Technology

Monitoring calibration of descriptive sensory panels using distance from target measurements

JC Castura et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2005)

Article Food Science & Technology

A panel performance procedure implemented in R

E Derndorfer et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2005)

Article Automation & Control Systems

Assessing the performance of a sensory panel-panellist monitoring and tracking

M Kermit et al.

JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS (2005)

Article Food Science & Technology

Performance comparison between trained assessors and wine experts using specific sensory attributes

MC Zamora et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2004)

Article Food Science & Technology

Training effects on performance of descriptive panelists

DH Chambers et al.

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES (2004)

Article Food Science & Technology

Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling

PB Brockhoff

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2003)

Article Food Science & Technology

Proficiency testing for sensory ranking panels:: measuring panel performance

JA McEwan et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2003)

Article Food Science & Technology

Proficiency testing for sensory profile panels: measuring panel performance

JA McEwan et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2002)

Article Food Science & Technology

Assessing sensory panelist performance using repeatability and reproducibility measures

F Rossi

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2001)

Article Food Science & Technology

Inter-laboratory comparison of sensory profiles:: methodology and results

J Pagès et al.

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2001)