4.6 Article

Enhancement-Mode Heterojunction Vertical beta-Ga2O3 MOSFET with a P-Type Oxide Current-Blocking Layer

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12031757

Keywords

gallium oxide; vertical heterojunction MOSFET; enhancement mode; current blocking layer; p-type oxide

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for National 111 Center [B12026]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0406500]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61874083]
  4. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2021JC-24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of p-type oxide as the current-blocking layer in the vertical heterojunction Ga2O3 MOSFET greatly improves device performance. By adjusting the doping concentration and thickness, the threshold voltage and breakdown voltage can be modified. Furthermore, other p-type oxides show promising performances as well.
The vertical heterojunction Ga2O3 MOSFET (Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor) with the p-type oxide as the current-blocking layer (CBL) is investigated for the first time using SILVACO simulation software. The results show that the threshold voltage of the device is easily positive, which means that the device works in the enhancement mode. By adjusting the doping concentration (from 2 x 10(17) cm(-3) to 2 x 10(18) cm(-3)) and thickness (from 0.4 um to 2 um) of p-SnO CBL, the threshold voltage is around from 2.4 V to 2.8 V and the breakdown voltage of the device can be increased from 361 V to 518 V. Compared with the original homojunction Ga2O3 vertical MOSFET with CBL, the p-SnO CBL can greatly improve the performance of the device. Other p-type oxides are also investigated as the CBL and show promising performances. This work has a certain guiding significance for the design of a vertical enhanced current-blocking layer MOSFET device and for the development of a Ga2O3 heterojunction power device.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available