4.6 Article

Exergoeconomic and Environmental Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization of a New Regenerative Gas Turbine Combined Cycle

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app112311554

Keywords

Brayton cycle; combined cycle system; exergoeconomic; exergy efficiency; Rankine cycle

Funding

  1. Danida Fellowship Centre
  2. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark [18-M06-AAU]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines three different configurations of combined cycle systems and concludes that the selection of the best configuration depends on the preferences and criteria of decision makers. Parametric analysis is conducted by changing various parameters to study the effects on output work, exergy efficiency, exergy-economic and environmental parameters. The study also attempts to optimize the performance of combined cycle systems considering three objective functions of exergy efficiency, total cost rate, and exergy unit cost of produced electricity.
Combined cycle systems have an important role in power generation. In the present study, three different configurations of combined Brayton and Rankine cycle system are studied from the perspective of energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental perspectives. Results indicate that it depends on the preferences and criteria of each decision maker to select the best configuration among the three proposed configurations as the final configuration. For the purpose of parametric analysis, the effect of changing various parameters such as compressor pressure ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature on the output work, exergy efficiency, exergy-economic and environmental parameters is studied. In addition, an attempt is made to optimize the performance of combined cycle systems considering three objective functions of exergy efficiency, total cost rate and exergy unit cost of produced electricity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available