4.6 Review

Denitrification in Intrinsic and Specific Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment: A Review

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app112210657

Keywords

denitrification rate; aquifer; groundwater quality; vulnerability assessment; nitrate pollution; saturated and unsaturated zones

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various groundwater vulnerability assessment methods have been implemented over the years to evaluate susceptibility to nitrate contamination, with denitrification being recognized as a key process to reduce nitrogen loading rates. While rating methods remain the most utilized, numerical models offer a more detailed approach to quantify denitrification rates. Future efforts should focus on developing user-friendly methods that can effectively incorporate denitrification considerations at large spatial and temporal scales.
Several groundwater vulnerability methodologies have been implemented throughout the years to face the increasing worldwide groundwater pollution, ranging from simple rating methodologies to complex numerical, statistical, and hybrid methods. Most of these methods have been used to evaluate groundwater vulnerability to nitrate, which is considered the major groundwater contaminant worldwide. Together with dilution, the degradation of nitrate via denitrification has been acknowledged as a process that can reduce reactive nitrogen mass loading rates in both deep and shallow aquifers. Thus, denitrification should be included in groundwater vulnerability studies and integrated into the various methodologies. This work reviewed the way in which denitrification has been considered within the vulnerability assessment methods and how it could increase the reliability of the overall results. Rating and statistical methods often disregard or indirectly incorporate denitrification, while numerical models make use of kinetic reactions that are able to quantify the spatial and temporal variations of denitrification rates. Nevertheless, the rating methods are still the most utilized, due to their linear structures, especially in watershed studies. More efforts should be paid in future studies to implement, calibrate, and validate user-friendly vulnerability assessment methods that are able to deal with denitrification capacity and rates at large spatial and temporal scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available