4.6 Article

Experimental Study on the Impact of CO2 Treatment on Different Lithofacies in Shale Oil Reservoirs

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12042217

Keywords

shale oil; lithofacies; CO2 treatment; micromorphology; porosity and permeability

Funding

  1. Central Program of Basic Science of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [72088101]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0196000]
  3. Foundation Program for Directly Affiliated Institutions of CNPC [2019D-500808]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper conducted systematic experiments to clarify the interaction between CO2 and shale in different lithofacies and draw relevant conclusions. The results showed that the effects of CO2 treatment on porosity and permeability varied depending on the lithofacies. For foliaceous shale, CO2 treatment had both improving and damaging effects on porosity and permeability, while for laminated shale, both porosity and permeability improved significantly. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the main lithofacies of the target formation before applying CO2 technology in shale oil reservoirs.
CO2 technology has been progressively used in the development of shale oil. After injection, CO2 can react with formation water to form carbonic acid, which then reacts with carbonate and silicate minerals, resulting in changes in porosity and permeability. However, there are some debates as to whether the effect of CO2 improves or damages porosity and permeability. So, in this paper, systematic experiments were carried out to clarify the interaction between CO2 and shale in different lithofacies and to draw a pertinent conclusion. The results showed that the shale in Qingshankou Formation could be divided into three main lithofacial types: foliaceous shale, laminated feisic shale and laminated diamictic shale. There were relatively more pores, some natural microfractures and small mineral particles in foliaceous shale, a few micropores and large mineral particles in laminated feisic shale, some biogenic calcium carbonate minerals and hardly any micropores in laminated diamictic shale. Due to the diversity of micromorphology and mineral composition, the effects of CO2 treatment had significant differences. For foliaceous shale, CO2 treatment had both improving and damaging effects on porosity and permeability; for laminated shale, both porosity and permeability improved significantly. So, it is necessary to identify the main lithofacies of target formation before the application of CO2 technology in shale oil reservoirs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available